Nov 21st, 2007 @ 4:47 am

Surprised? No.

From BBCNews, of course:

Bush 'involved' in CIA leak case

A former White House press secretary has said the US president was involved in misinforming the public over the leaking of a CIA agent's identity.

In an excerpt from his book, Scott McClellan says George W Bush helped mislead the public over the role in the affair of two White House aides.

The CIA agent, Valerie Plame, says her identity was leaked because her diplomat husband opposed the Iraq war.

The White House said Mr Bush would not ask anyone to pass false information.

Mr McClellan's book is not scheduled for publication until April and the excerpt released was brief.

It refers to a White House press conference he attended in 2003.

At the conference, Mr McClellan told journalists that the two aides Karl Rove and Lewis "Scooter" Libby were "not involved" in leaking Ms Plame's identity.

The excerpt reads: "There was one problem. It was not true.

"I had unknowingly passed along false information. And five of the highest ranking officials in the administration were involved in my doing so: Rove, Libby, the vice-president, the president's chief of staff, and the president himself."

link to full article
MyWay News has another article.

Like, this is news to anyone, really. It only confirms what most of us thought was going on anyway. The BBC article has a quote from the current White House Press Secretary who says "The president has not and would not ask his spokespeople to pass on false information." Oh, right! Let's not forget The Downing Street Memo from the UK acknowledging everyone knew there were no WMDs in Iraq.

Oh! Did you hear the latest military fiasco-slash-embarrassment? Seems as though in order to beef up the over-worked, over-tired, under-paid military grunts, the various branches offer "bonuses" for signing on. The deal is, remain in for X amount of time and the bonus is yours. Fine. Except…what happens if you are injured and can't stay in, like far too many young men and women? You guessed it. You lose the bonus. So much for supporting our troops, eh? "We'll send you into a battle zone where you could get blown up at any time. Survive this journey, and the money is yours. Get injured, well, bets are off. Oh, and buy your own protective gear, learn how to armor your own vehicle, and good luck on that bomb in the sand thing."

Carpetbagger Report
KDKA Report






Oct 3rd, 2007 @ 10:57 pm

In The News

"Sulu" gets an asteroid named after him. How cool is that?

From Wired News:

Asteroid Named for `Star Trek' Actor

By SAMANTHA GROSS
Associated Press Writer

NEW YORK (AP) — A piece of outer space named for George Takei is in kind of a rough neighborhood for somebody who steers a starship: an asteroid belt.

An asteroid between Mars and Jupiter has been renamed 7307 Takei in honor of the actor, best known for his role as Hikaru Sulu in the original "Star Trek" series and movies.

"I am now a heavenly body," Takei, 70, said Tuesday, laughing. "I found out about it yesterday. … I was blown away. It came out of the clear, blue sky - just like an asteroid."

The celestial rock, discovered by two Japanese astronomers in 1994, was formerly known as 1994 GT9. It joins the 4659 Roddenberry (named for the show's creator, Gene Roddenberry) and the 68410 Nichols (for co-star Nichelle Nichols, who played Lt. Uhura). Other main-belt asteroids have been named for science fiction luminaries Robert Heinlein and Isaac Asimov.


link to article

###

WTF is going on with Shrub? If anyone needed to take Prozac, he should be given it via IV until he either croaks or wakes up to pull his head out of his ass. At least someone has said aloud what so many Americans have already said or thought. Sad that the someone happened to be the one Shrub wants to "strike".

From BBC News:

Iran says US too tied up to fight

Washington's military commitments to Iraq and Afghanistan would hamstring an attempt to wage war on Iran, the Iranian foreign minister has said.

"Our analysis is clear: [the] US is not in a position to impose another war in our region, against their taxpayers," Manouchehr Mottaki told reporters.

He warned Washington against making such a "mad decision".

Iran rejects accusations that it is seeking to build atomic weapons under the cover of a nuclear power programme.

Despite its conviction that the US would find launching another military assault extremely taxing, Iran was making preparations for such an attack, Mr Mottaki said on the fringes of a UN General Assembly session in New York.

He said information had been received which gave specific details of planned strikes.

The US says it is pursuing a diplomatic resolution but has refused to rule out a strike against Iran.

link to article

##

Back to science and away from madness…

Wired News was chuck full o' Sputnik articles.

Sputnik's Grandchildren: Satellite Technology 50 Years Later

Sputnik Stunned the World, and Its Rocket Scared the Pentagon

Secrets of 1957 Sputnik Launch Revealed

The BBC News site also had a Sputnik article:

Russia marks 50 years of Sputnik






Sep 27th, 2007 @ 1:25 am

"Patriot Act" Challenged

From MyWay News:

2 Patriot Act Provisions Ruled Unlawful

By WILLIAM McCALL

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) - Two provisions of the USA Patriot Act are unconstitutional because they allow search warrants to be issued without a showing of probable cause, a federal judge ruled Wednesday.

U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken ruled that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, as amended by the Patriot Act, "now permits the executive branch of government to conduct surveillance and searches of American citizens without satisfying the probable cause requirements of the Fourth Amendment."

Portland attorney Brandon Mayfield sought the ruling in a lawsuit against the federal government after he was mistakenly linked by the FBI to the Madrid train bombings that killed 191 people in 2004.

(…)

Mayfield claimed that secret searches of his house and office under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act violated the Fourth Amendment's guarantee against unreasonable search and seizure. Aiken agreed with Mayfield, repeatedly criticizing the government.

"For over 200 years, this Nation has adhered to the rule of law - with unparalleled success. A shift to a Nation based on extra-constitutional authority is prohibited, as well as ill-advised," she wrote.

By asking her to dismiss Mayfield's lawsuit, the judge said, the U.S. attorney general's office was "asking this court to, in essence, amend the Bill of Rights, by giving it an interpretation that would deprive it of any real meaning. This court declines to do so."

(link to article)

By the way, the USA Patriot Act's official title is: Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act - what a mouthful! They must have shortened it to Patriot Act in order for Shrub to get it right.

Linkage:

Patriot Act Guide however, each time I try to view this guide, the bandwidth is exceeded and I cannot access it. Gee, if the money wasn't being funneled into an endless, needless war, the gov't might be able to afford more bandwidth.

Wikipedia | US Patriot Act

ACLU | US Patriot Act | "Reform the Patriot Act" action | Text of the US Patriot Act

WhiteHouse.gov | Patriot Act it is interesting to read their side of it. Sad, but interesting.

Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) | Patriot Act






Aug 17th, 2007 @ 2:04 pm

Why We Should Care

A good friend of mine, heck, my best friend, sent me an email the other day. Lately she must be in a patriotic mood because a lot of what she's sent has been anti-Islam/Muslim. But, then again, she's a devout Republican and has never been exorcised of that demon.

Usually I read what she has forwarded (along with all the other info from other forwards) and I get on with whatever else I have been doing. I roll my eyes and hit the delete button harder than usual but that's as far as I go.

What she has most recently sent me, I just cannot let it pass.

Basically, the message in the post was "I don't care." Here's a snippet.

"Are we fighting a war on terror or aren't we? Was it or was it not started by Islamic people who brought it to our shores on September 11, 2001?

Were people from all over the world, mostly Americans, not brutally murdered that day, in downtown Manhattan , across the Potomac from our nation's capitol and in a field in Pennsylvania?

Did nearly three thousand men, women and children die a horrible, burning or crushing death that day, or didn't they?

And I'm supposed to care that a copy of the Koran was "desecrated" when an overworked American soldier kicked it or got it wet?..Well, I don't. I don't care at all.

I'll start caring when Osama bin Laden turns himself in and repents for incinerating all those innocent people on 9/11.

I'll care about the Koran when the fanatics in the Middle East start caring about the Holy Bible, the mere possession of which is a crime in Saudi Arabia .

I'll care when these thugs tell the world they are sorry for hacking off Nick Berg's head while Berg screamed through his gurgling slashed throat.

I'll care when the cowardly so-called "insurgents" in Iraq come out and fight like men instead of disrespecting their own religion by hiding in mosques.

I'll care when the mindless zealots who blow themselves up in search of nirvana care about the innocent children within range of their suicide bombs.

I'll care when the American media stops pretending that their First Amendment liberties are somehow derived from international law instead of the United States Constitution's Bill of Rights.

In the meantime, when I hear a story about a brave marine roughing up an Iraqi terrorist to obtain information, know this: I don't care.

When I see a fuzzy photo of a pile of naked Iraqi prisoners who have been humiliated in what amounts to a college-hazing incident, rest assured: I don't care.

When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told not to move because he might be booby-trapped, you can take it to the bank: I don't care.

When I hear that a prisoner, who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat, and fed "special" food that is paid for by my tax dollars, is complaining that his holy book is being "mishandled," you can absolutely believe in your heart of hearts: I don't care.

Emotional terrorism is being used in this message. First off, the mess in Iran has very little to do with what happened in NYC, PA, and DC. Bush didn't send troops to Iran to stop terrorism. It has been proven that the reasons for the orders were falsified and had nothing to do with the terrorists responsible for the 9/11 tragedies. Anyone who understands these facts and dares to bring this up is labeled unpatriotic and uncaring. "Proof" of this happens later in the email letter:

If you don't agree, then by all means hit the delete button. Should you choose the latter, then please don't complain when more atrocities committed by radical Muslims happen here in our great Country!

I care! Hell, I care as much as everyone else! I just don't think their deaths justify the hatred of an entire religion and people! To say that Islam is to blame for 9/11 is saying that Christianity is to blame for the mess in Iran! Wasn't Hitler a Christian? Wasn't Mussolini a Catholic? Aren't the people who blow up abortion clinics and gay bars doing so based on their religious beliefs? Their Christian beliefs?

When we stop caring about those around us, we become no better than the worst of them. We are lower than the worst of them. Caring is what sets the winners apart. Caring is what keeps us alive. We cannot, should not, use the religion as a basis of war without first understanding our own.

Justifying one tragedy by causing another is wrong. Just plain wrong. We can't survive as a people by doing that. The U.S. is based on freedoms. This nation was started by folks who were tired of having freedoms taken away. They had enough of financial and emotional terrorism and fought back. Then they set up laws to protect the very freedoms they valued the most. Religious freedom and the freedom to be different were very, very important to them.

To say we don't care now about the rights of others, the freedoms of others, we spit in the founding fathers' faces. We step on the very reason so many died trying to gain. We should care, a LOT, about the behavior of our troops in Iran. We should care that they are overwhelmed, understaffed, over-worked, and under-paid. We should care that these factors create an atmosphere where torturing prisoners is an acceptable behavior. We should care that innocents are being killed by alleged "friendly fire". We should care that their rights to religious items while in prison is being ignored. We should care that their religious items are being desecrated. We cannot stand upon a platform of freedom while shoring up the foundation with the bodies of innocents, the humiliation of prisoners of war, lies and falsified documents, and hatred of religions not our own.

Are we no more than children on the playground? "Osama just beat me up but I can't reach him so I am going to beat you instead and tell everyone that I'm doing it because you kinda sorta maybe know Osama. But I'm really beating you up now because you beat me up a long time ago and got away with it because the teachers called us back into the classroom."

Our troops need to come home. They aren't there being brave Americans. They are stretched to their limit with inadequate equipment surrounded by citizens who didn't want them there to begin with. They are there doing their job because their boss is a bully in the global playground and told them to go.

Oh, and dear Patriotic zealots who write emails such as the one I quoted above, get your facts straight first. Islamics don't believe in nirvana, that's a Buddhism and Hinduism thing. College hazing, such as piling naked men together, is illegal in the US and therefor the same behavior should be illegal in the military.






Dec 20th, 2006 @ 12:06 am

Perfect Gift

Still looking for the perfect gift for that weird person in your family? How about a "Two Years and Counting" calendar?

Officially, it is called the 2007 George W. Bush Out of Office Countdown wall calendar: Two Years and Counting

I came across it by accident over at Amazon.






Aug 18th, 2006 @ 12:41 am

Good Judge!

From BBCNews:

US judge rules wiretaps illegal

A US programme to tap some phones without warrants is unconstitutional, and must be halted at once, a federal judge in Detroit has ruled.

The scheme, approved by President George W Bush in 2001, involves tapping conversations between some callers in the US and people in other countries.

Civil liberties campaigners brought the case against the programme, which was uncovered by the US media.

(snipped)

Mr Bush authorised the Terrorist Surveillance Programme, as the secret interception scheme is known, after the 11 September 2001 attacks on Washington and New York and insists that it is a vital tool in the US war on terror.

Bush setback

But after the programme was uncovered by the media a year ago, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit arguing that the secret interception of US phone calls was unconstitutional.

In her 43-page ruling on the case, Judge Anna Diggs Taylor said that the surveillance programme violated protections on free speech and privacy.

"Plaintiffs have prevailed, and the public interest is clear, in this matter. It is the upholding of our constitution," Judge Taylor wrote.

Ann Beeson, the ACLU's associate legal director and the lead attorney for the plaintiffs, said that "by holding that even the president is not above the law, the court has done its duty".

Correspondents say the ruling is another setback for the president's self-proclaimed wartime powers.

He has already been rebuked by the US Supreme Court over his plans to try suspects being held in Guantanamo Bay. The Supreme Court stated that the president did not have a blank cheque.

full article

So what does this tell Bush? That he is losing his footing as "The Decider"? Nah, he'd have to get his head out of Daddy's ass first.

Saw a bumper sticker at Waffle House the other day. One end of it is a photo of Shrub Jr. Then the words say: Intelligent Design or Random Mutation?






Jul 27th, 2006 @ 5:54 pm

The 23rd Qualm

Got this in an email from my friend Elena.

To all: Since prayer, to whichever Deity you prefer, seems to be the only hope for the nation, I am sending the following to be used in your service of choice.

Bush is my shepherd;
I dwell in want.

He maketh logs to be cut down
in national forests.

He leadeth trucks
into the still wilderness.

He restoreth my fears.

He leadeth me in the paths of international disgrace
for his ego's sake.

Yea, though I walk through
the valley of pollution and war,
I will find no exit, for thou art in office.

Thy tax cuts for the rich
and thy media spinning,
they discomfort me.

Thou preparest an agenda of deception in the presence of thy religion.

Thou anointest my head with foreign oil.

My health insurance runneth out.

Surely megalomania and false patriotism shall follow me all the days of thy
term,

And my jobless child shall dwell
in my basement forever.

Amen






::Older Posts


-- Pun of the Day:
-- Copyright © 2003 - 2008, Thought Patterns | Contact Me | Blog Sitemap | Blog Help

-- PaulaOffutt.com | Site Map | Website Help

-- KG4VPY | HolyRoller.org | Southern SDs | Sumo, The Goldfish

-- Powered by WordPress version 2.2.2 in just 1.12 seconds | RSS 2.0 | Comments RSS 2.0

-- Theme is ThotRot, based on WordPress Classic | This blog contains 1693 posts for a total of 456849 words resulting in 966 comments.


Spam Karma 2 has killed 523293 comments; moderated 341 comments; and passed 1204 comments.

-- Googlebot visited this page Wednesday, November 12, 2008



donation logo | Green Web Hosting! This site hosted by DreamHost. | counter | 7/16/05 | Creative Commons License logo |