Aug 23rd, 2008 @ 2:38 pm

Writing for Whom?

Used to, I just sat down and wrote. My mind wasn't crowded by crap such as sentence structure, plot, and the dreaded Show, Don't Tell. (shudder)

I could sit down and write several thousand words a day and not break a sweat. A story just flowed from one point to the other, rambling along its way. When it was done, I just cut out what didn't need to be there and fixed the rest.

Now I'm lucky to get several hundred words a day. I keep thinking (which is a problem of its own) about where the paragraph/chapter is going, how to keep it in line, etc etc etc. I don't let the story just take off and take me along with it.

It's driving me nuts.

It started not long after BGCFA was released. I stopped writing for myself and started writing for Them. The fun, the joy, was lost in the chaos. Or, perhaps, it was lost in the order. Chaos is something I almost thrive on. Yeah, sure, I like my sheets to match. And I like all the spoons in the drawer to face the same way. And watching me play Tetris would make you think I have OCD. Trust me, I don't have OCD (or CDO, which is the same but in alphabetical order like it should be).

I am trying to write, honest I am. The deadline isn't bothering me, so that's not why I am failing. I tend to set myself up to fail in order to prove I am scum on the pond God created. I may not have OCD but I do have OHR. Anyway, I am trying to write. I want to let loose what is inside but it is hesitant. Afraid to show its face only to get slapped down by the Chicago Manual of Style. And since it knows the CMS is a hard back book of 956 pages, it isn't going to just rush out and greet the world again. I may be crazy but I ain't stupid.

What I think I will do is dig out my Zen, select the Writing folder of music, and just start typing. Worked before. Maybe it will work again.






Feb 8th, 2008 @ 1:34 am

Romney Out!

Yay!

That man scared me. Still does. Something about him gave me the willies.

In a BBC article, he is quoted as saying:

In this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign be a part of aiding a surrender to terror.
Mitt Romney

See, that's what scares me. The man probably truly believes this. We surrendered to terror already when Shrub sent troops to Iraq. We surrendered to our terror of terrorists by letting those in power do things they shouldn't. We surrendered to them, The Bush Administration, by sitting back and not arguing. Or not arguing loud enough. We were told we should be afraid. That part is right. But we were being told to be afraid of the Wolf by the Fox itself.

As for Obama and Clinton, I am for Obama. Yeah, I know, I should support the woman. But I can't. Bill Clinton tried to do a good job while in office but his penis got more attention with congress. If we want change, true change, then Hilary Clinton isn't that change. I feel our best chance as Americans would be to have Obama as president with Hilary Clinton as vice president. With his penis and her brain, perhaps we will regain what we have lost in the rest of the world's eyes.






Jan 30th, 2008 @ 1:39 pm

Things To Do

Instead of write:

- clean fish tanks, inside and out.
- make fish and snail food (which really is odoriferous)
- sort through "to be filed" stack and put in order (but don't actually file 'cause that's something you can do later, see)
- surf the 'Net looking for the answer to a question you've not asked yet (very Zen, I think)
- rearrange decorations in 56g tank just for giggles
- stare out the window toward the bird feeder and pretend you are deep in thought when, in reality, you're wondering just where the heck did all those Cardinals come from and could they get any redder without exploding?
- look around on desk for some obscure USB adapter that you put away somewhere "safe" and haven't seen since. not that you need the adapter…
- read through the scads of posts from the High Performance Software Defined Radio e-list. The technical talk makes little sense but to read it feels as if you are doing something with the brain.
- spend time putting this post together, including all the linkages.






Jan 1st, 2008 @ 12:08 am

Ranting

I got an email today from my step-dad. I love and admire the man, I truly do. He tries to do what he thinks is right and that is more than the vast majority of people out there.

The email was a FWD (which I hate, by the way) concerning the alleged "Religion of Peace Demonstration" that took place in London. The email has photos showing the stereotypical Muslim men carrying hate signs (and rather nasty ones, too). The email ends with this text:

Why would anyone think that we should be at war with such nice, peaceful Moslems?!

Americans need to know - You need to forward this one to everyone! These Pictures tell it all!

Muslims have stated that England will be the first country they take over!

These are pictures not shown on American TV or in American Newspapers (as they might help Bush's war on terror), but were forwarded to me by a Canadian Friend who thought Americans ought to know!

We take a short break to have a quick lesson in how to spot a hoax. Each and every sentence ends in an exclamation point. Second, "forwarded to me by a…friend". Toss in the misspellings and hit the delete button.

Okay, rant back on. I will say up front that not all the email says is a hoax. Yes, the images are from London. Yes, the people with the signs are Muslims. But the demonstration was not called the "Religion of Peace Demonstration". It was protests from the Scandinavian cartoons back in Jan. '06.

My first warning to be doubtful was the statement "These are pictures not shown on American TV or in American Newspapers (as they might help Bush's war on terror)" Puh-leeze! Since when has the US press not supported Bush's war? Has Fox News buckled to the pressure of true journalism and stopped doctoring news?

Okay, back to my original rant.

I wrote a long missive in response to the email then cut it down to just the basics. My rant would have been lost and would have simply upset my step-father. I've decided to post it here, instead. How nice of me, eh? The text below is from me.

What I am going to do is start collecting images and news clips of Fred Phelps. Now there is a Christian extremist! Him and his followers make some of the Islamic extremists look mild! They protest with violent signs, slogans, and shouts at a wide variety of events. Funerals of service men and women who died in Iraq or Afghanistan. Funerals of the people who died when the Minneapolis bridge collapsed. Funerals of AIDS victims, regardless of their sexual preference. Feel like hating someone? Take him on! Sadly, he's not alone in the Christian extremist realm. Anyone ever sit up late and watch the 700 Club? Or truly listened to Pat Roberts, Jerry Falwell, or any of those other great examples of the Christian faith? I'm glad no one thinks all Christian preachers are like them, either!

Do we condemn the entire Christian religion because of Phelps and Roberts? No. Then why condemn the entire Islamic religion based on the actions of their extremists? Why the double standard? Because we aren't Islamic and therefore it is okay? Us vs Them? We follow the same God! We follow the same freakin' God! Christians follow Christ and Muslims follow Muhammad. Different doors to the same God! I cannot hate an entire group for the actions of a small percentage of them. If I did, then I'd never speak to Jim again because he is a Republican.

Please, don't send me any more "hate" mail. I don't want to hate anyone. I want to be a Christian, which means to be Christ-like. Christ only got really mad once. That was when he saw the moneychangers in the temple. Like I said earlier, ever watched the 700 Club?

There. I said it. I feel better. As always, I welcome comments.

Linkage:
Urban Legends (now part of About.com) - Muslim 'Religion of Peace' Demonstration
Snopes - Muslim Demonstration
NewsBlaze - "Religion of Peace Demonstration Hoax" Photos
Wikipedia - Fred Phelps | 700 Club






Nov 21st, 2007 @ 4:47 am

Surprised? No.

From BBCNews, of course:

Bush 'involved' in CIA leak case

A former White House press secretary has said the US president was involved in misinforming the public over the leaking of a CIA agent's identity.

In an excerpt from his book, Scott McClellan says George W Bush helped mislead the public over the role in the affair of two White House aides.

The CIA agent, Valerie Plame, says her identity was leaked because her diplomat husband opposed the Iraq war.

The White House said Mr Bush would not ask anyone to pass false information.

Mr McClellan's book is not scheduled for publication until April and the excerpt released was brief.

It refers to a White House press conference he attended in 2003.

At the conference, Mr McClellan told journalists that the two aides Karl Rove and Lewis "Scooter" Libby were "not involved" in leaking Ms Plame's identity.

The excerpt reads: "There was one problem. It was not true.

"I had unknowingly passed along false information. And five of the highest ranking officials in the administration were involved in my doing so: Rove, Libby, the vice-president, the president's chief of staff, and the president himself."

link to full article
MyWay News has another article.

Like, this is news to anyone, really. It only confirms what most of us thought was going on anyway. The BBC article has a quote from the current White House Press Secretary who says "The president has not and would not ask his spokespeople to pass on false information." Oh, right! Let's not forget The Downing Street Memo from the UK acknowledging everyone knew there were no WMDs in Iraq.

Oh! Did you hear the latest military fiasco-slash-embarrassment? Seems as though in order to beef up the over-worked, over-tired, under-paid military grunts, the various branches offer "bonuses" for signing on. The deal is, remain in for X amount of time and the bonus is yours. Fine. Except…what happens if you are injured and can't stay in, like far too many young men and women? You guessed it. You lose the bonus. So much for supporting our troops, eh? "We'll send you into a battle zone where you could get blown up at any time. Survive this journey, and the money is yours. Get injured, well, bets are off. Oh, and buy your own protective gear, learn how to armor your own vehicle, and good luck on that bomb in the sand thing."

Carpetbagger Report
KDKA Report






Sep 27th, 2007 @ 1:25 am

"Patriot Act" Challenged

From MyWay News:

2 Patriot Act Provisions Ruled Unlawful

By WILLIAM McCALL

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) - Two provisions of the USA Patriot Act are unconstitutional because they allow search warrants to be issued without a showing of probable cause, a federal judge ruled Wednesday.

U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken ruled that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, as amended by the Patriot Act, "now permits the executive branch of government to conduct surveillance and searches of American citizens without satisfying the probable cause requirements of the Fourth Amendment."

Portland attorney Brandon Mayfield sought the ruling in a lawsuit against the federal government after he was mistakenly linked by the FBI to the Madrid train bombings that killed 191 people in 2004.

(…)

Mayfield claimed that secret searches of his house and office under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act violated the Fourth Amendment's guarantee against unreasonable search and seizure. Aiken agreed with Mayfield, repeatedly criticizing the government.

"For over 200 years, this Nation has adhered to the rule of law - with unparalleled success. A shift to a Nation based on extra-constitutional authority is prohibited, as well as ill-advised," she wrote.

By asking her to dismiss Mayfield's lawsuit, the judge said, the U.S. attorney general's office was "asking this court to, in essence, amend the Bill of Rights, by giving it an interpretation that would deprive it of any real meaning. This court declines to do so."

(link to article)

By the way, the USA Patriot Act's official title is: Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act - what a mouthful! They must have shortened it to Patriot Act in order for Shrub to get it right.

Linkage:

Patriot Act Guide however, each time I try to view this guide, the bandwidth is exceeded and I cannot access it. Gee, if the money wasn't being funneled into an endless, needless war, the gov't might be able to afford more bandwidth.

Wikipedia | US Patriot Act

ACLU | US Patriot Act | "Reform the Patriot Act" action | Text of the US Patriot Act

WhiteHouse.gov | Patriot Act it is interesting to read their side of it. Sad, but interesting.

Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) | Patriot Act






Sep 26th, 2007 @ 2:00 pm

Just Say No to Bishops

From BBCNews:

Shock at archbishop condom claim

The head of the Catholic Church in Mozambique has told the BBC he believes some European-made condoms are infected with HIV deliberately.

Maputo Archbishop Francisco Chimoio claimed some anti-retroviral drugs were also infected "in order to finish quickly the African people".

The Catholic Church formally opposes any use of condoms, advising fidelity within marriage or sexual abstinence.

Aids activists have been angered by the remarks, one calling them "nonsense".

"We've been using condoms for years now, and we still find them safe," prominent Mozambican Aids activist Marcella Mahanjane told the BBC.

(…)

Archbishop Chimoio told our reporter that abstention, not condoms, was the best way to fight HIV/Aids.

"Condoms are not sure because I know that there are two countries in Europe, they are making condoms with the virus on purpose," he alleged, refusing to name the countries.

"They want to finish with the African people. This is the programme. They want to colonise until up to now. If we are not careful we will finish in one century's time."

Aids activists in the country have been shocked by the archbishop's comments.

"Condoms are one of the best ways of getting protection against catching Aids," said Gabe Judas, who runs Tchivirika (Hard Work) - an theatre group that promotes HIV/Aids awareness.

"People must use condoms as it's a safe way of having sex without catching Aids," he told the BBC.

Archbishop Chimoio, who made the remarks at celebrations to mark 43 years of independence, said that fighting the disease was a serious matter.

"If we are joking with this sickness we will be finished as soon as possible.

"If we want to change the situation to face HIV/Aids it's necessary to have a new mentality, if we don't change mentality we'll be finished quickly," he said.

"It means marriage, people being faithful to their wives… (and) young people must be abstaining from sexual relations."

(link to article)

He has valid points. Abstention IS the best way to prevent the spread of HIV. However, that point is lost in his claim of tainted condoms. The Catholic Church has had blinders on for too long. It is my opinion that they feel that if you die from a sexually transmitted disease, then that is your punishment for your sin.

Long ago someone gave this analogy for something quite different, but it fits here, too.

A man is walking along a river and sees a child out in the water, drowning. He goes and gets the child, wraps him in a blanket, then sees another child. He rescues that one, too. Meanwhile, other people stop to help. They gather together to assist the two children when they see yet more out in the water, drowning. The first man and several others, rush out into the water to save the children, bring them ashore, where others help to dry them off, warm them, etc. And, you guessed it, more children are out in the water, drowning.

This goes on and on. Resources are limited and while outside help if arriving, they are not enough to help the growing number of children out in the river, still drowning. Not all are saved, sadly.

As in the first time I heard this, someone needs to go upstream to see why so many children are in the water. How are they getting in there? What can be done to stop them from getting into the water to begin with?

The Catholic Church doesn't care how you get into the water. You got there through your own sins and if you can pull yourself out, they'll help you. Good children don't get into the swift water. If they only went upstream a little bit and see that there are things that can be done to prevent the problem…well, there'd be less people drowning.

Abstention is nearly impossible. It isn't in our basic nature to abstain from sexual relations. I am soooo glad I am not a teen in today's world. Surrounded by sex from all sides. Sex is used in advertising, in politics, in nightly news, in newspapers, the vast Internet is overwhelmed by it. How to abstain when surrounded by mostly positive imagery of it? "Drink our beverage and get laid!" "Eat our protein bar and get laid!" "Use our tires and get laid!"

Safe sex in literature is gone. It was so wonderfully present for a while, and now it is gone. Abstinence is rarely in literature unless it is a side-effect of something another. Purity and all that. Why can't one be pure and still get a little sex on the side? Purity is a state of mind, not a state of body. The body can never be pure. It pees, it shits, it sweats, it grows fungus and bacteria.

Nevertheless, it is scary what this man believes. I wonder how the Catholic Church will respond?






::Older Posts


-- Pun of the Day:
-- Copyright © 2003 - 2008, Thought Patterns | Contact Me | Blog Sitemap | Blog Help

-- PaulaOffutt.com | Site Map | Website Help

-- KG4VPY | HolyRoller.org | Southern SDs | Sumo, The Goldfish

-- Powered by WordPress version 2.2.2 in just 1.41 seconds | RSS 2.0 | Comments RSS 2.0

-- Theme is ThotRot, based on WordPress Classic | This blog contains 1676 posts for a total of 448556 words resulting in 925 comments.


Spam Karma 2 has killed 408824 comments; moderated 327 comments; and passed 1163 comments.

-- Googlebot visited this page Wednesday, August 20, 2008



donation logo | Green Web Hosting! This site hosted by DreamHost. | counter | 7/16/05 | Creative Commons License logo |