bookmark_borderHappy Birthday Hubble!

(insert sexy Monroe singing Happy Birthday)

Sent into space on April 24, 1990, Hubble is now old enough to be drafted, but not old enough to drink. Would it want to drink, given that it is already so high and aimed toward the wonders of the universe? Or is that a good enough reason onto itself?

At any rate, the best thing about Hubble, and the fact it is operated by NASA, is that the images it takes are public domain.


much larger version which shows the wonder and awe of Hubble

Linkage:
Space.comAll About Hubble Telescope | Complete Hubble Coverage
LiveScience.com’s SpaceHubble Photographs Dozens of Colliding Galaxies
WikipediaHubble Space Telescope | List of Hubble links
Wikimedia CommonsHubble images
Space Telescope Science InstituteHubbleSite.org
NASAMain Hubble page | Multimedia

bookmark_borderAmazon.com Mess Cont.

And the fun goes on and on.

Perhaps the most important news is the National Writers Union (NWU) issued a statement.

As far as I know, Regal Crest Enterprises has not been contacted by Amazon.com regarding this issue.

Regularly updated information page – http://www.writersweekly.com/amazon.php
Amazon/Booksurge Ultimatum Update By Angela Hoy

Other Thought Patterns (the blog you are reading now) related posts (in reverse order):

Amazon.com Mess Continues (4/16)
Amazon, Borders, etc (4/11)
Amazon On Drugs Cont. (4/2)
Amazon On Drugs, Part 2 (4/2)
Amazon.com Is On Drugs (3/29)

bookmark_borderBook Distribution

Regal Crest Enterprises, my publisher, has negotiated a contract with Bella Books and Distribution. Bella is the distributor for 13 lesbian presses, including their own line of books.

Having RCE now part of this distributor means when GLBT friendly bookstores make their orders, they will have access to RCE books via the website and the catalogs. They did before, only now they won’t have to play distributor hop. We all like one-stop shopping, eh?

The book publishing and distribution game gives me headaches and threatens already endangered brain cells. It is not just a simple matter of printing them and sending them out and getting money. It is about sales, marketing, distribution, and waiting a long time to see financial gain for the efforts.

See? Headache now.

Note: Those who use Firefox vs IE (shudder) will experience some menu problems with the new Bella Books and Distribution website. While the site looks freakin’ great, I hope they are able to resolve the issue.

Oh, and while you can buy books from the Bella website, I recommend getting them from Star Crossed Productions, a bookstore, instead.

Linkage:
Bella Books and Distributing
Publishers listing
RCE listing
Star Crossed Productions

bookmark_borderAmazon.com Mess Continues

Forget the effin’ recipe. Just start stomping around like they are grapes and we want to make wine, not whine.

Linkage:

Writers Weekly ongoing page of articles and links including a shared message from the Washington State Attorney General

There’s even an online petition (although I doubt it would do much good other than to make us feel like we are doing something)

An open letter from Small Publishers Association of North America (SPAN) – Amazon.com, BookSurge, and POD

bookmark_borderMS XP vs Vista

What a choice, eh?

This June, Microsoft will discontinue the XP operating system (OS). Silly of them, yes?

Take, for instance, Galen Gruman. A longtime technology journalist, Gruman is more accustomed to writing about trends than starting them.

But after talking to Windows users for months, he realized his distaste for Vista and strong attachment to XP were widespread.

“It sort of hit us that, wait a minute, XP will be gone as of June 30. What are we going to do?” he said. “If no one does something, it’s going to be gone.”

So Gruman started a Save XP Web petition, gathering since January more than 100,000 signatures and thousands of comments, mostly from die-hard XP users who want Microsoft to keep selling it until the next version of Windows is released, currently targeted for 2010.

On the petition site’s comments section, some users proclaimed they will downgrade from Vista to XP – an option available in the past to businesses, but now open for the first time to consumers who buy Vista Ultimate or Business editions – if they need to buy a new computer after XP goes off the market.

Others used the comments section to rail against the very idea that Microsoft has the power to enforce the phase-out from a stable, decent product to one that many consider worse, while profiting from the move. Many threatened to leave Windows for Apple or Linux machines.

(…)

Al Gillen, an IDC analyst, estimated that at the end of 2008 nearly 60 percent of consumer PCs and almost 70 percent of business PCs worldwide will still run XP. Microsoft plans to end full support – including warranty claims and free help with problems – in April 2009. The company will continue providing a more limited level of service until April 2014.

Gillen said efforts like Gruman’s grass-roots petition may not influence the software maker, but business customers’ demands should carry more clout.

“You really can’t make 69 percent of your installed base unhappy with you,” he said.

(source)

I use XP. If I get a new computer, I will downgrade from Vista back to XP. Vista has stunk since it first come out and it still stinks.

There’s rumors of M$’s next OS, called “7”. Many people hope that “7” will be better than Vista and will be like XP felt after the “ME” version of Windoze.

Oh, and the above article said this:

On the petition site’s comments section, some users proclaimed they will downgrade from Vista to XP – an option available in the past to businesses, but now open for the first time to consumers who buy Vista Ultimate or Business editions – if they need to buy a new computer after XP goes off the market.

Anyone know anything about this? Is it an automatic thing or what?

Linkage:
Save XP petition
ZDNet article/post about Windows 7

bookmark_borderAmazon, Borders, etc

Karin Kallmaker, a wonderful (and prolific) lesbian romance writer, has a blog where she answers fan mail as well as just chit-chats with readers. She has a post about what Border’s bookstores are up to. Seems as though they are cutting back drastically on the books they carry in order to arrange the books with the cover facing out, vs the spine facing out. This means a single paperpack fantasy novel would take up the space of roughly three or 4 novels.

I agree with Karin that this move may not sell as many books as they think it will. But I do agree that this move could push people more toward Amazon.com.

Speaking of Amazon.com, Writer’s Weekly has another post up about the mess.

WritersWeekly was also the first to report Amazon’s actions to the Washington State Attorney General’s Anti-Trust Division, simply giving a bullet-point synopsis of what had occurred and asking them if Amazon might be violating any laws. They responded to my initial fax in under one hour, and have since been bombarded with complaints about Amazon’s plans. Last night, the Washington State Attorney General sent us an update, which states they are investigating the situation and that “it may be more appropriate to refer this matter to one of the federal antitrust agencies for review.”

Late last week, the American Society of Journalists and Authors (ASJA), the Author’s Guild, The Independent Book Publishers Association (PMA), The Small Publishers Association of North America (SPAN), and the UK’s Leading Writers Website, YouWriteOn.com, have all publicly questioned and/or denounced Amazon’s actions. The Author’s Guild is asking anyone with any information about the subject to contact their legal services department.

Be sure to read the rest of the article. Oh, and be sure to read the article she links to at the end. I don’t know if I understand all of it (after all, it is nearly 2am) but it presents some interesting ideas.

bookmark_borderAmazon On Drugs Cont.

Boil previous mess. Add executives, Master of Business Administration holders, and panicking authors. Stir well.

Writers Weekly website has a more link friendly page set up for the Amazon.com-slash-BookSurge escapades. http://www.writersweekly.com/amazon.php. She had to because the news and information just keeps getting weirder.

I keep hoping that this is just an elaborate April Fool’s hoax that has gotten horribly out of hand. If it is, then it isn’t funny so stop it, please.

At any rate, seems as though some publishers are talking about “it” and others are not. Some have said “We ain’t signin’ nothin'” and others have asked for a decorative pen to go with the signing ceremony.

As far as I know, my publisher, Regal Crest Enterprises, has not been contacted by Amazon. It could be they are focusing their attention on the Big Dogs first.

Some of the more enlightening information comes from the comments to the Writers Weekly articles.

Linkage:
Print CEO Blog – “Still No Word from Amazon….”

Wall Street Journal – “Amazon Tightens Grip on Printing

Author Nation forum – “TOPIC: Amazon plus Booksurge? WTF?

There are tons more. Do a Google search or look at the list of them to the right of the Writers Weekly article.

Phew. This recipe stinks.

bookmark_borderAmazon On Drugs, Part 2

Oy. The cauldron continues to bubble and all sorts of stuff pop up out of the stew.

First, surprise, Amazon.com has come out with a public letter about the topic, too.

PaidContent.org has a short article (Amazon Does Damage Control…) with wonderful comments! The comments explain a lot and I understand the situation better.

Lightning Source has a press release/public statement about the topic.

Ingram Book Group, a big distributor that owns Lightning Source, has commented in a Publisher’s Weekly article.

Be sure to catch up on the latest over at Writer’s Weekly. The article reminds everyone that the problem isn’t Amazon.com vs Ingram/Lightning Source. It is Amazon.com vs RCE and any other publisher that uses Lightning Source (LS). There’s a big difference. LS and Ingram could afford to take on Amazon.com in the courts. But can small publishers?

So far, the publishers that have been directly effected have been the bigger vanity (publish-on-demand) publishers rather than the print-on-demand publishers.